Dear SJWs

Dear SJWs

I hear a lot of you complain about people using the term "normal". The common problem seems to be that none of you understand the concept. So in the interest of education, here are several dictionary and encyclopedia definitions of the term "normal".

Merriam-Webster: usual or ordinary : not strange
Dictionary.com: conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal;regular; natural.
Oxofd Dictionary: Conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected:
it’s quite normal for puppies to bolt their foodnormal working hours

Not really normal to squeeze your guts into the smallest
possible space... 

Wikipedia: Normality (also known as normalcy) is the state of being "normal", as opposed to being deviant, eccentric or unusual. Behavior can be normal for an individual (intrapersonal normality) when it is consistent with the most common behaviour for that person. Normal is also used to describe individual behaviour that conforms to the most common behaviour in society (known as conformity). Definitions of normality vary by person, time, place, and situation – it changes along with changing societal standards and norms. Normal behavior is often only recognized in contrast to abnormality.

This person would definitely not be considered "normal"

"smooshing" your feet in to the smallest shoes
possible,
probably not something done by any majority groups

Now I would have added the encyclopedia Britannica version, except they have so many versions from mathematics to psychology to a town in Illinois. So in the interest of being concise I decided against it. Since the only normal we're looking at here is essentially in the concept of statistical modelling. 
Normal being the average of the populous of an area. Now, while normality differs from place to place; I.E: Neck rings and neck stretching is quite normal in some African and Asian sub-cultures, it is (comparatively) abnormal or unusual in the rest of the world.

Not something you see very often in Walmart.
But among her people she's probably the girl-next-door.

 Having tattoos in an Amish community would be abnormal since the majority of the community would not have tattoos. Hell wearing your matric dance/prom dress to a biker bar will usually make you look a little out of place. Basic maths; If you have 10 apples and 7 are red and 3 are green, the NORM would be red apples, since they are most abundant. XX and XY chromosomes are in abundance in most species on the planet. Most other variations are genetic ABNORMALITIES. 

We all have our little kinx.
But no one can validate your existence except you.

Western "weirdness"

There are many abnormal subcultures among humans. Some harmless, some physically dangerous. some that just make people stop and stare. A subculture who completely understands "standing out" would be the goths. This is a subculture who embraces the stand-alone concept and have no need for anyone else to validate their existence, the fact that it's the only subculture to have survived the 70s, 80s, 90s and to this day, says enough.

More Western "weirdness"

Now that's not to say these abnormalities are abhorrent and we wished they didn't exist. Most people don't believe that LGBT community are the 4th sign of the coming apocalypse, just that they stray from what mother nature/God decided was best for propagation of said species. No one ever said transgender was wrong, just that, in the US alone only 3.5%of the populous is transgendered. Little is know about the rest of the world. 

And Even More Western "weirdness"

In fact no one is trying to wipe transgenders off the face of the planet just by virtue of the fact that they say transgenders are not part of the norm. All they're saying is that transgenders are NOT PART OF THE NORM. The point is, homosexuals, effeminate men, masculine woman and transgenders have been around for much longer than the SJW fad and will, most likely, be here long after whiny, agenda-driven, college/tumblr twats disappear. They are even considered a third gender in some parts of Asia. 
To sum up; "cisgered" heterosexuality is still the norm among the human population, no matter how many times you call for an end to cisgender or heterosexuality. It's what naturally propagates the human race (no artificial insemination is not a natural way of procreation and using a someone's frozen sperm and a turkey baster isn't natural either*). But no one said people who veer from the norm can't also have their own piece of sunshine. And for the most part, in Western society, they do.

And just when you thought your cupcake, cream doughnuts were safe

I'm Just Sayin'*an easy way to tell if something is natural or not is; would it be possible with out scientific advancements?